News (Updated January 3, 2010)

[Home]  [
Previous news]


China drops hepatitis B check for school, work

BEIJING China will soon stop mandatory hepatitis B tests for people applying for jobs or admission to schools, the Health Ministry said Tuesday, after years of efforts by civic groups to fight discrimination against carriers of the liver disease.

Hepatitis B is endemic in China , with an estimated 120 million sufferers. Currently, students applying for schools and job seekers are usually required to undergo health checks that include tests for the disease. People are sometimes denied positions even though the disease cannot be transmitted by casual contact.

Ministry spokesman Mao Qun'an said a soon-to-be-released government policy will strike hepatitis B off such standard health checks, and prohibit other restrictions or limits on hepatitis B carriers from education and work, acknowledging that many still face unfair treatment.

"According to experts, the current society's misunderstanding of hepatitis B virus carriers is mainly due to the lack of knowledge about hepatitis B," Mao said. He pointed out that hepatitis B is transmitted by blood, sexual contact or from a mother to a child. "Daily work, study or live contact will not lead to the spread of hepatitis B."

The non-governmental organization Yirenping, which fights discrimination against people with the disease, welcomed the announcement but said the move should have come sooner and warned that tight supervision was required for the rule to be implemented successfully.

"I think the government's decision is just a passive response to the cries of the people. Such a response is also too slow," said the group's founder, Lu Jun. "I'm also worried about the supervision for this new policy. If no punishment would be carried out for companies or health organizations doing the screening, the policy might not be effective."

Despite official recognition of the need to address discrimination against people with diseases like HIV/AIDS or hepatitis, Chinese authorities often harass activists who try to fight for equal rights for affected individuals.

Yirenping has assisted individuals in filing over 40 lawsuits, mostly discrimination claims, since it was founded in 2006, according to its Web site. In July, authorities raided the group's offices and seized dozens of newsletters in apparent retribution for the group's legal advocacy work.

 

Clinton donor list doesn't say who gave in '09

By SHARON THEIMER and LARRY MARGASAK, Associated Press Writers Sharon Theimer And Larry Margasak, Associated Press Writers Jan 1, 2010

In this June 21, 2007 file photo, Frank Giustra, a Canadian ...WASHINGTON – Former President Bill Clinton's charity released a donor list Friday under an agreement with President Barack Obama to prevent conflicts with Hillary Rodham Clinton's role as secretary of state, but it failed to identify who gave in 2009, her first year in the Cabinet post.

The donor list disclosed by the William J. Clinton Foundation did show that conservative Richard Scaife, who bankrolled anti-Clinton investigations in the 1990s, pitched in money. Also, Saudi Arabia and Norway each donated in the range of $10 million to $25 million to the former president's charity. Several other foreign governments, including Kuwait , also participated. The biggest donors included the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which gave more than $25 million.

The contributors also included troubled insurance giant American International Group, banking industry fixture Citigroup, Inc. and entertain Barbra Streisand's foundation.

Clinton foundation spokesman Matt McKenna said that the Saudi government didn't send money to the foundation in 2009. He said the list doesn't single out those who contributed since Mrs. Clinton became secretary of state early last year, but rather identifies donors who have given over a period of years. Many of the names among the thousands on the list also appeared on the first list the Clintons released in December 2008, and there was no way to discern whether these donors also gave last year.

McKenna said later Friday that the foundation would put out a new list shortly identifying those who gave in 2009.

McKenna said that Friday's initial disclosure, nevertheless, complied with the memorandum of understanding the Clintons reached when Hillary Rodham Clinton took the secretary of state post.

The Clintons agreed to annually disclose the names of donors to the former president's foundation to address concerns about potential conflicts of interest between his fundraising abroad and his wife's role in helping to direct Obama administration foreign policy.

"I am deeply grateful to the many generous contributors who made it possible for my foundation to accomplish so much in 2009, including increasing the number of people on lifesaving HIV/AIDS treatment, helping cities reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, and inspiring millions of children to lead healthier lives," Bill Clinton said in a written statement.

The William J. Clinton Foundation works in the United States and around the world on such issues as health care, particularly HIV/AIDS; climate change; and economic development. It also runs the Clinton Presidential Center in Little Rock , Ark. , which includes Clinton 's presidential library.

In addition to failing to say which donors gave in 2009, the foundation didn't identify individual contributors' employers, nationalities or any other details. It gave only ranges rather than precise donations, and didn't provide a fundraising total. It did say that more than 90 percent of the gifts it received last year were in donations of $250 or less.

An eye-catching name is Scaife, who financed investigations of Clinton by American Spectator magazine and backed other conservative groups that heaped criticism on the former president while he was in office.

Scaife contributed between $250,001 and $500,000. McKenna confirmed the donor listed as Richard Scaife was the same person.

As first lady, Mrs. Clinton called the activities of Scaife and others part of "a vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president."

James Carville, Clinton 's former campaign aide, once called Scaife "the archconservative godfather in (a) heavily funded war against the president."

The list shows that those giving the biggest money to the group over the years included many longtime Clinton friends and political supporters: prominent Democratic fundraisers, overseas businessmen and foreign governments including Saudi Arabia .

In addition to Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates' foundation, Canadian mining tycoon and Radcliffe Foundation chief executive Frank Giustra, the Children's Investment Fund Foundation and UNITAID each gave more than $25 million.

Bill Clinton joined Giustra on a 2005 trip to Kazakhstan ; within days after the pair met with Kazakhstan 's president, Giustra's business lined up preliminary deals giving it rights to buy into uranium projects controlled by a Kazakhstan state-owned enterprise. Bill Clinton has said he had nothing to do with that.

In UNITAID's case, almost all of the money simply passed through the foundation to buy commodities, the foundation said.

Besides Norway and Saudi Arabia , those giving $10 million to $25 million included AUSAID, the Australian government's overseas aid program; longtime Democratic Party donors and fundraisers Stephen Bing and Fred Eychaner; and COPRESIDA, a Dominican Republic government agency formed to fight AIDS, whose donation passed through the foundation for commodity procurement.

Among the contributors of $5 million to $10 million were the Netherlands ' Nationale Postcode Loterij, Irish Aid, the Elton John AIDS Foundation, the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative - Canada , and prolific Democratic donor Haim Saban and his family's foundation.

American International Group, the insurance giant bailed out by the U.S. government, gave $250,001 to $500,000 to the foundation, the list showed.

Several foreign governments gave $1 million to $5 million: Kuwait , Qatar , Oman , Brunei Darussalam, the Taiwan Economic and Cultural Office.

Other donors in that range included the Dubai Foundation; Swedish Postcode Lottery; Friends of Saudi Arabia; energy company Entergy; Streisand's foundation; Citi Foundation, the charity of the Citigroup banking and financial services company; Ethiopian-Saudi business tycoon Sheikh Mohammed H. Al-Amoudi; Saudi businessman Nasser Al-Rashid; international oil, gas and mining businessman Lukas Lundin; international steel tycoon Lakshmi Mittal; and international wind power company Suzlon Energy Ltd., which has operations in at least 21 countries; Coca-Cola Co., and the Wal-Mart Foundation.

The Clintons were under no legal obligation to identify foundation donors. Presidents typically do not disclose the names of those who give to their foundations, even when the givers include foreign governments. Former President George W. Bush hasn't said who is contributing to construction of his presidential library in Texas , for example.

In addition to providing a foundation donor list, the Clintons agreed that new donations from foreign governments would be examined by government ethics officers. An Obama spokesman said at the time that the agreement would meet the incoming president's transparency promise and help to avoid potential conflicts of interest.

 

People with HIV allowed into US after 22-year ban

3 January 2010  By Willemien Groot

 After 22 years, the ban on HIV/AIDS patients travelling to the United States has ended. The controversial law was introduced at the peak of the AIDS epidemic under then President Ronald Reagan. The US was one of the few countries in the world to categorically refuse entry to people who were HIV positive.

"People with HIV are not a danger to public health. I just wanted to be able to visit my friends," says Jan Willem de Bruin of the Dutch gay rights organisation COC wholeheartedly. Mr De Bruin found the ban discriminatory. His American friends could travel back and forth to Europe without any problem, while a return visit called for a little inventiveness.

It was easy enough to get around the ban with a few tricks. For instance, by not saying you had an infectious disease on the infamous form at US immigration. It was much more difficult to get HIV inhibitors into the US , explains Mr De Bruin.

"There are people who decided to take a 'drug holiday'. They stopped taking medicine during that period. But that is not advisable because then the virus is not suppressed and there is a health risk. You could also send the medicine by post, but that became more difficult because of the powdered letter scares. This year, I gave my pills to American friends to take home for me."

Leading role for US
The lifting of the ban is an important signal. President Barack Obama wants his country to take a leading role in combating HIV and AIDS across the world. In 2012, the country will even host a two-yearly international AIDS Conference. A meeting which the US missed out on for 22 years because of the restrictions. Very strange, thinks Mr De Bruin.

"We had eight years of Bill Clinton, but apparently even then the time was not ripe to change the law. It isn’t President Obama who takes the credit either. It all started during the last Bush administration. Even then there were huge discussions. Eventually, the Senate and the House of Representatives adopted the act and President Obama signed it. But it is strange that it took so long."

Transition period
In a country with hundreds of international airports and tens of thousands of customs officers, there is bound to be one which does not know the new instructions. Mr De Bruin does not expect people with HIV suddenly not to have any more problems when they try to get into the US as of 4 January. He is interested to hear the experiences of people who try to visit the US after this date.

"On the HIV association website there is plenty of information for people who are refused entry. One of the tips is to call in the help of Immigrations Equality, an American organisation which defends the rights of immigrants, if you happen to encounter a customs officer who has not read his instructions, they can help you."

And Mr De Bruin? He is planning to travel to New York in February. "By then everyone should know the new rules."

 

Be afraid, not ashamed, says safe sex campaign

January 3, 2010

 HIV Mortgages

Specialist HIV mortgage advice &arranging. Also HIV life assurance

www.hivmortgages.com

Fear factor ... ads in the Federal Government’s campaign stress the dangers of unprotected sex.

Young people who have contracted a sexually transmitted infection should not be ashamed, according to a government campaign encouraging Australians to get tested.

The national campaign, which begins today using radio, magazines, the internet and billboards, comes after a worrying rise in chlamydia, HIV/AIDS and syphilis infections, the Federal Government says.

Conveying the message ''STIs are spreading fast - always use a condom'', it encourages those who have had unprotected sex to

see a doctor to discuss getting tested.

''The new year and holiday period is the season of parties … it's important to be aware of the risks of unprotected sex,'' Health Minister Nicola Roxon said.

Research conducted before phase one of the campaign in May and June revealed that Australians were not well informed about the benefits of condom use, she said.

It found that heterosexuals mainly used condoms to prevent pregnancy and gay men were becoming complacent about the risk of HIV.

The campaign, which will also target Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander youths, urges people not to be ashamed if they have an STI.

''This can prevent them seeking help and treatment,'' Ms Roxon said, emphasising the importance of early detection and treatment.

''If left untreated, STIs can have serious, lasting health implications.''

 

Online brothels becoming more popular with Singapore youth

January 2, 2010

Written by Our Correspondent

Online brothels offering girls from various nationalities are becoming increasingly popular among Singapore men looking for a quickie, especially the youth.

Frequent raids on the red-light district of Geylang had forced the freelance prostitutes to retreat to cyberspace to solicit for customers.

As many as five new websites have appeared in the last few months alone offering a myriad of “services” from sexy massage to discreet sexual encounters from freelance prostitutes.

Some appear to be websites set up by organized syndicates while others are hosted by independent freelance prostitutes themselves who are here in Singapore to make a quick buck.

Online prostitution is not new in Singapore . Famous sex forum Sammyboy has a dedicated “freelance” section to allow prostitutes and pimps alike to post their services and contacts.

One owner of such a site claimed he is a “landlord” who is helping his PRC tenants to earn some “extra cash”.

The photos of the girls are listed on the site including their “statistics”, prices, types of services offered and “field reports” from previous patrons.

Propsective clients have to contact the pimp directly using the handphone number provided who will inform him of the time and venue for the “transaction” to take place.

Such online brothels are seeing an increase in business lately as they offer customers the flexibility to choose their time and girl as well as a place outside the usual red-light district to pursue their pleasures.

When interviewed by the Straits Times, Dr Carol Balhetchet, director of youth services at the Singapore Children’s Society, said:

“The scary part is prostitution has come to your doorstep – and it’s not just available to adults…..the scary part about the young is, they want to experiment. Now, they don’t need to go to Geylang…Prostitution can be more gypsy-like…In that sense, it’s risky.”

Unlike licenced prostitutes working in designated brothels, freelance prostitutes who ply their trade online do not need have to go for monthly medical examation and blood tests to detect sexually transmitted diseases such as HIV.

With the two Integrated Resorts set to open this year, the demand for such online sexual services is likely to increase especially with  Singapore ’s lax immigration and travel restrictions.

Foreign prostitutes especially those from China often come to Singapore to “work” on a one-month tourist visa.

Others come on a two-year student visa ostensibly to study in private institutions, but end up working in KTV lounges.

Asked about the online brothels by the Straits Times, the police would only say: ‘Police will investigate reports made and take action if any offence is disclosed.’

The police did not say whether anyone has been arrested in connection with the online brothels which have been in existence for Singapore for a very long time already.


[Home]  [Previous news]