News (Updated April 19,
2003)
[Home]
[Previous
news]
Of The Morning Call
|
Thu Apr 17, 5:32 PM ET
|
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - If the findings at one Texas hospital are any indication, many HIV infected patients who die of the disease are not on potentially life-saving medications at the time of death.
An analysis of patients who died at the hospital in 1999 and 2000 found that more than half of the people who died were not taking potent combinations of drug "cocktails" known as highly active antiretroviral therapy, or HAART.
"I was really startled to see that that so many patients were not on HIV therapy in an era when it's supposed to be widespread, and access is there," said the study's lead author Dr. Mamta K. Jain of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas in a prepared statement.
Since 1996, when HIV drugs known as protease inhibitors were introduced, the standard of care in the U.S. has been to fight HIV infection using HAART.
In the current study, published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, doctors compared HIV positive patients who died in 1995 (before HAART medications where available) to those who died in 1999 and 2000. They also assessed whether or not patients in the later group were taking HAART.
In all, Jain's team evaluated a total of 200 HIV/AIDS patients -- 112 who died in 1995 and 88 who died in either 1999 or 2000.
Despite "widespread availability" of HAART only 48 percent of patients who died in 1999 or 2000 were taking HAART at the time of death, the authors report.
The main reasons the patients weren't taking the drugs were an inability to adhere to the complex treatment regimen and an HIV diagnosis less than six months prior to death. Other reasons included an inability to tolerate the drugs due to underlying liver disease, the study indicates.
Still, the team did see a decline in the number of people dying due to HIV. However, "AIDS-defining illnesses," such as Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia were still an important cause of death in patients not taking HAART, according to the report.
"I don't want to paint a gloomy picture, said Jain. "Definitely, the number of cases of patients dying with AIDS has decreased radically. But we were expecting to see a change in the types of diseases people were dying from, and we didn't see that."
"I think the study is important because, if you look at the HIV/AIDS literature, you see these dramatic changes, and people are living longer ... but I think we kind of lose sight of the fact that there are still areas in the country that still are seeing a lot of the same problems that we did prior to HAART being available."
In the current study, many of HIV infected individuals not receiving HAART were ethnic minorities.
Nine out of 12 patients who were diagnosed with HIV shortly before death, and 12 of 18 patients who did not take HAART as prescribed were black or Hispanic, the authors write.
Last year the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that up to one-third of HIV positive people do not appear to be receiving treatment. The CDC estimates that 850,000 and 950,000 HIV-infected individuals in the U.S.
SOURCE: Clinical Infectious Diseases 2003;36.
|
Wed Apr 16, 5:08 PM ET
|
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Despite recent theories that the AIDS epidemic in some African countries arose from unsafe medical injections and blood transfusions, scientists said Wednesday that the pattern of the disease matches more closely with one primarily spread by unprotected sex.
The UK investigators compared the changing rate of HIV in sub-Saharan African countries -- home to the most people infected with HIV -- to that of hepatitis C, a liver-attacking virus spread mainly through contact with infected blood.
Globally, more people are infected with hepatitis C than HIV. However, unlike other nations, sub-Saharan African countries have a higher rate of HIV than hepatitis C.
A needle tainted with hepatitis C-infected blood is six times more likely to infect a person than a needle tainted with HIV is, the authors of the new study note in the April 17th issue of Nature.
And given that HIV is more common than hepatitis C in sub-Saharan Africa, the high prevalence of HIV must be due to factors besides the use of unsterile needles or contaminated blood products, they say.
Although many Africans with HIV have become infected as a result of unsafe medical practices, that route of transmission "is not the dominant contributor to the African HIV epidemic," the researchers report.
"I think it's because of unsafe sex," study author Dr. Edward C. Holmes of the University of Oxford told Reuters Health.
"This is clearly the key factor, although there are clearly a variety of socioeconomic factors which impact on this," he added.
Consequently, efforts aimed at preventing new infections should focus on promoting safe sex, Holmes and his team write.
Although most scientists have believed that heterosexual sex is the cause of HIV in 90 percent of new cases in adults in sub-Saharan Africa, that belief was recently challenged in a report from an international team of eight experts.
The experts claimed that only one-third of adult cases of HIV in the region could have resulted from unsafe sex. Another, more significant factor in the rate of transmission may have been medical practices, they said, including the use of tainted needles while treating patients.
As evidence in favor of the role of unsafe injections, the researchers noted that the virus is more easily transmitted through such injections and infected-blood transfusions than through heterosexual sex.
But a comparison between rates of HIV and hepatitis C in sub-Saharan Africa paints quite a different picture, according to Holmes and his team.
The majority of Africans with HIV live in South Africa, the authors note. In the case of that country, the incidence of HIV among adults has increased from less than one percent in 1990 to almost 25 percent in 2000.
In contrast, the rate of hepatitis C has remained steady and relatively low over the same time period, the authors point out.
These divergent trends, they conclude, suggest "that current levels of HIV prevalence are not primarily the result of using unsterile medical equipment or contaminated blood products."
SOURCE: Nature 2003;422:679.
| Press Release | Source: AIDS Healthcare Foundation |
Monday April 14, 11:15 am ET
"Fuzeon must not be priced significantly above existing HIV/AIDS medications," said Michael Weinstein, AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) president. "AIDS drugs are priced at the maximum the market will bear, regardless of production costs," he added. "Other drug makers will follow suit with equally high prices, and access to care will be the casualty."
"We don't want to face another situation in which patients who have failed to respond to other medications may have to fight again to access new anti-retrovirals as it was in the past for protease inhibitors" said Mauro Guarinieri, Vice Chair of The European AIDS Treatment Group, and member of The Italian Community Advisory Board, the coalition which has launched the campaign in Italy.
"People's lives should not be placed in the balance when drug companies set about determining the price of their drugs," said Doris Wahl, Executive Director of the Whittier-Rio Hondo AIDS Project. "The fact that the proposed price for Fuzeon is too high to be covered by the state AIDS Drug Assistance Program puts virtually every one of our clients at unacceptable risk."
AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) officials were unimpressed by reports that Roche had made agreements to lower Fuzeon prices for U.S. AIDS Drug Assistance Programs. "AHF believes the price reduction to ADAPs are a public relations stunt," said Clint Trout, AHF Associate Director of Government Affairs. "Analysts had predicted a price range of $15,000 - $17,000 for Fuzeon. It looks like Roche priced the drug higher with the expectation to make public 'concessions.' Because the lower price is only in effect for one year, when there will not be large supply of the drug available, this is not really a large concession from the company. In addition, the price concession is not available to Medicaid programs, which serve more patients."
Trout also noted that substantial US taxpayer funds were used to invent Fuzeon. "Why should the US taxpayer be allowed only token discounts from a foreign-owned company like Roche for drugs invented with US taxpayer dollars?" Advocates have documented that the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) invested at least $3.5 million in the invention of Fuzeon, with up to 17 grants NIH grants having been involved.
AIDS Healthcare Foundation is the US' largest AIDS organization. AHF serves thousands of patients in California, New York and Florida regardless of their insurance status or ability to pay. In addition, AHF currently operates two free AIDS treatment clinics in Africa: the Ithembalabantu (Zulu for "people's hope") Clinic in KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa & the Uganda Cares Healthcare Center in Masaka, Uganda. www.aidshealth.org .