News (Updated January 8, 2005)

[Home]  [
Previous news]


Nature Medicine  11, 3 (2005)
doi:10.1038/nm0105-3a

New patent rules drive Indian drug firms to research

K.S. Jayaraman

Hyderabad

An international patent agreement that goes into effect on 1 January 2005 is compelling Indian drug companies to pump money into research and development (R&D), strike alliances with companies abroad and seek innovative ways to stay in business. The new law could have far-reaching consequences for many important medicines, including antiretroviral drugs for HIV/AIDS in developing countries.

According to the World Health Organization, India is the fourth largest producer of pharmaceuticals and 66.7% of its exports go to developing countries. India is also the world's leading supplier of generic medicines.

India has maintained low drug prices because of a law that allowed its companies to produce cheaper versions of patented products. But those days ended with the country's entry into the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). The treaty requires India and some other countries to recognize product patents and stop selling imitations.

An internal study by the Indian government estimates that, in the antibiotics sector alone, TRIPS will create a $713 million loss to the local economy and $57 million in profits to multinationals each year. Indian pharmaceutical companies are rushing to stave off loss by shifting from business-driven research to research-driven projects. "Indian drug firms can survive only if they have new drugs in their intellectual property pipeline," says Sudhakar Bangera, head of clinical research of Hyderabad-based Asian Clinical Trials Pvt Ltd.



 Indian drug firms can survive only if they have new drugs in their intellectual property pipeline. 

Sudhakar Bangera
Asian Clinical Trials Pvt Ltd.
In November, Nicholas Piramal India Limited launched a $25 million R&D facility. In September, Mumbai-based Wockhardt Limited commissioned a $50 million biopharmaceutical complex—India's largest—in Aurangabad. Sun Pharma and Lupin Limited have also expanded their R&D operations.

Some front-runners with financial muscle can afford to focus on R&D, but analysts predict that second-rung companies will have to struggle as contract manufacturers and distributors for multinationals.

One strategy is to invest in small US biotech startups that possess novel technologies in return for a share in their intellectual property. For instance, Bangalore-based Biocon has reached agreements with Nobex Corporation, which is developing oral insulin and Vaccinex, which has technology for monoclonal antibodies. Cadila Pharmaceuticals in Ahmedabad is set to sign a similar deal with a Japanese group developing a HIV vaccine.

Under TRIPS, drugs patented after 1 January 1995 will be eligible for patents in India. Experts say at least 15% of drugs in the market—including AIDS drugs—could be withdrawn, but the loss of even one generic drug could deal a fatal blow to its Indian manufacturer.

Organizations such as Médecins Sans Frontières, which rely on Indian generics in AIDS-hit developing countries, are "gravely concerned," says the group's president Rowan Gillies. The Indian Drugs Manufacturers' Association, a group of about 500 pharmaceutical companies, has suggested paying four percent of the turnover to patent holders to avoid courtroom battles.

Meanwhile, Indian companies have not fared well with new drugs: of the three molecules licensed to multinationals, none has been successful; 18 others are reportedly in trials but the first home-grown drug is at least seven years away, Sudhakar says.

"We will not survive in the R&D game," says Prasanta Kumar Ghosh, former adviser to the government's Department of Biotechnology. "We have to survive by making generics without infringing on patents."

That is not likely to be easy. The US recently ruled to stop Ranbaxy Laboratories and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories from marketing copies of Pfizer's antifungal drug Diflucan and the blood pressure drug Norvasc in the US. In September, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories dropped its patent challenge against Novartis over Lamisil, a widely prescribed oral antifungal agent. Pfizer is also fighting Ranbaxy in a US court to prevent entry of the Indian company's version of Lipitor, the world's top-selling cholesterol-lowering drug.


German Team Finds New Way to Block HIV Replication


Tue Jan 4, 2005 11:44 AM ET

By Philip Blenkinsop

BERLIN (Reuters) - German scientists have found a new way to prevent the HIV virus from replicating, offering hope in the face of the virus's increasing resistance to existing drugs.

Joachim Hauber, a professor at the Heinrich-Pette Institute in Hamburg, told Reuters on Tuesday his team had identified a protein in human cells that the HIV virus uses to reproduce and run tests on a chemical that blocks this protein's action.

Drugs such as GlaxoSmithKline's AZT and existing inhibitors produce drug resistance because they work on viral proteins, which can mutate when the HIV virus replicate.

Human cells are much less prone to mutations, so the German researchers believe the cellular protein they have singled out is a promising target for drugs that could avoid creating multiple resistance.

"We have identified a new possibility, but we cannot judge it yet. We are far away from a therapy," said Hauber, who heads the institute's department of cell biology and virology.

He added that it typically requires five to 10 years from test phases before a drug becomes available.

"It's not a therapy that will be available tomorrow."

Hauber, whose findings are published in this month's issue of the Journal of Clinical Investigation, said his research team had tested a particular chemical's action for 12 weeks.

The tests showed it consistently blocked multiplication and had no tendency of the HIV virus to develop any resistance. It also produced no clear toxic side-effects, a major problem in the development of medicines to fight HIV/AIDS. The chemical is an experimental drug, developed by a firm in Pennsylvania, Cytokine PharmaSciences Inc., which is in clinical trials for the treatment of Crohn's disease, a condition that causes chronic inflammation of the small intestine.

The human immunodeficiency virus, which infects about 40 million people worldwide, is incurable and leads to AIDS, although a cocktail of drugs called highly active antiretrovial therapy can suppress it and keep patients healthy for years.

Almost all anti-retroviral drugs attack the virus after it has infected the body's immune system and simply suppress replication, so patients must take the drug for life.

 

 

Gene Helps People Resist AIDS Infection- Study


Thu Jan 6, 2005 02:27 PM ET

By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Correspondent

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A gene that may help block the AIDS virus from getting into cells seems to protect some people from the deadly and incurable infection, researchers said on Thursday.

They found that people who carry extra copies of the gene are less likely to become infected with the virus, which affects 40 million people worldwide.

The findings may eventually lead to better ways to prevent and treat HIV, which has killed more than 25 million people since it was first identified in the early 1980s, said the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which funded the study.

It also may help explain overall human immunity against infectious diseases, the researchers write in an advance report in the journal Science.

The gene, called CCL3L1, controls production of an immune system signaling chemical, or chemokine.

Normally, genetic variation means people have slight mutations or variations in a gene, or working and non-working copies -- one copy inherited from the mother and one from the father. In this case, people actually have multiple copies of the entire gene, said Dr. Sunil Ahuja of the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio, who led the study.

"About five percent of the human genome has got large chunks of sequence that are duplicated," Ahuja said in a telephone interview.

For CCL3L1, some people have no copies of the gene at all and some people have four, five and more. This chemokine is associated with a receptor -- a cellular entryway -- known as CCR5.

CCR5 is known to affect susceptibility to HIV infection and to how quickly an infected person progresses to AIDS.

STUDYING DIFFERENT ETHNIC GROUPS

For their study Ahuja and colleagues in the United States, Britain and Argentina analyzed blood samples from more than 4,300 HIV-infected and non-infected people of different ancestral origins.

They counted how many copies of the CCL3L1 gene each person had, and found big variations.

For example, HIV-negative black adults had an average of four copies of CCL3L1, while HIV-negative European-Americans averaged two copies each and uninfected Hispanic-Americans had an average of three copies.

The more copies a person had, the less likely he or she was to be infected with HIV.

And it was not the absolute number of extra copies of the gene that mattered, Ahuja's team found. Instead, it was whether a person had more copies than average for his or her ethnic group.

In general, each extra copy of the CCL3L1 offered 4 percent to 10 percent protection from the virus, Ahuja said.

About 1 percent of people of Caucasian descent have a mutation in the CCR5 gene that makes them very unlikely to acquire HIV, or to come down with AIDS once infected. That led Ahuja's team to look at chemokines that interact with CCR5.

He described infection as a battle between the virus and the body's immune system chemokines, all trying to get into immune cells called T-cells. "The virus is trying to compete with sites for chemokines," he said.

The outcome depends on how much virus is in the blood, how many CCR5 receptors a cell has and how much chemokine is around.

Dr. Matthew Dolan, an Air Force colonel at Brooks City-Base in San Antonio who worked on the study, said the finding could help doctors decide when and how to treat HIV-infected patients with cocktails of anti-viral drugs. It could also help in designing new vaccines and testing current HIV vaccines, Dolan said.

He said it was unclear if the CCL3L1 chemokine itself could be made into a treatment of vaccine.

"You don't know if varying what nature has wrought here could improve this disease or worsen some other disease," Dolan said.

 

Condoms stretched by best brands test


Wed Jan 5, 2005 01:52 AM ET

By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Correspondent

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The consumers group best known for rating cars and washing machines has turned its testing prowess to condoms to find out which ones measure up best and how other birth control methods compare.

The nonprofit Consumers Union says in a new guide to contraception that the seven top U.S. types of condom they studied did not burst despite vigorous testing, and all models met international standards.

But results showed that the top brand, able to take the most punishment, was the Durex Extra Sensitive Lubricated Latex, according to the report.

Other top-performers include the Durex Performax Lubricated, Lifestyles Classic Collection Ultra Sensitive Lubricated and TheyFit Lubricated.

A melon-coloured model distributed by Planned Parenthood performed the worst, bursting during a test in which the latex condoms were filled with air.

The group says its review of contraceptives was not politically motivated, although there is an intense debate among health professionals and advocacy groups about the focus on abstinence-only education by the Bush administration.

"We plan our testing programs quite a while in advance. This is purely accidental," said senior editor Nancy Metcalf.

Consumers Union uses standardized tests to rate the products it examines, which for latex condoms involves filling them with air. There is no accepted method to test silicon or non-latex condoms.

"You end up with a balloon 3 feet (a metre) tall and a foot (30 cm) wide. They can really stretch an amazing amount," Metcalf said in a telephone interview.

The New York-based organization, which publishes the Consumer Reports magazine, also tested 16 other contraceptive choices.

"Condoms remain the only family planning and pregnancy prevention method that can help prevent sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV, which causes AIDS," the group, which has issued similar reports on condoms periodically since 1979, said in a statement.

"Condoms have improved since the mid-nineties because industry manufacturing standards have become more universally used and more effective," added Edward Kippel, who led the condom test project.

Intrauterine devices or IUDs have also become safer than in previous years, as have birth control pills, including so-called emergency contraception, the group said.

While abstinence has a 0 percent failure rate, doing nothing to prevent pregnancy has an 85 percent failure rate, the group found.

A U.S. government report published last month shows 98 percent of all U.S. women who have had sex have used birth control.

 


[Home]  [Previous news]