News (Updated June 8,
2003)
[Home]
[Previous
news]
|
2 hours, 30 minutes ago
|
BEIJING (AFP) - China issued new health directive on treating patients with both AIDS and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and threatened to prosecute any hospital refusing to treat such patients.
The directive, posted on the Ministry of Health website, did not say whether any such cases have been recorded, but warned that any carriers of the HIV virus that causes AIDS, who comes down with SARS or is suspected to have SARS, must receive immediate medical treatment.
"Any SARS-appointed hospital that refuses (to accept patients with HIV or AIDS) will be seriously investigated at every level of health administration in accordance with the 'Administrative Law on Prevention of Infectious Diseases'," the circular said.
China has an estimated one million HIV carriers, a number that could increase tenfold in 10 years if immediate medical measures are not taken, the World Health Organization has warned.
AIDS and HIV carriers are believed to be highly suspectible to a SARS attack because their immune system is already compromised, Western health workers have said.
According to WHO statitistics, SARS has been most fatal among elderly patients or patients with existing medical conditions that have compromised their immune systems.
WHO disease experts also expect that an HIV or AIDS carrier would also be extremely infectious due to their lowered state of immunity.
The new directive pointed out that if a patient is to be transferred from a general hospital to a SARS hospital his or her medical history must also be passed along.
China Sunday reported no new cases of SARS and one SARS fatality, the 14th consecutive day that fewer than 10 new cases of the respiratory illness has been reported in the country, the worst hit by the mysterious new disease.
China now has reported 5,328 cases of SARS and 339 deaths.
|
Mon Jun 2,11:19 AM ET
|
By Alison McCook
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Doctors should not
automatically give HIV drugs to every child who may have been accidentally
exposed to the virus that causes AIDS, according to the American Academy of
Pediatrics.
Although quickly starting treatment with HIV drugs -- an approach called
post-exposure prophylaxis -- may reduce the risk that the virus takes hold after
a suspected exposure, doctors need to first consider whether the risk of
infection is greater than the risks associated with taking the drugs, they said. For instance, Dr. Peter L. Havens of the Medical College of Wisconsin told
Reuters Health that the risk of getting HIV after accidentally sticking yourself
with a needle used on an HIV-positive person is actually quite low -- around 3
in 1000.
When a child finds a needle by accident, the HIV status of its last user is
not known, Havens said. And the longer HIV is exposed to air, the less likely it
is to cause infection.
"You only recommend postexposure prophylaxis if you know that the person
is infected with HIV and that there was a true high-risk exposure," he said
in an interview.
"So when you get right down to it, the number of times that this would
be recommended in actual practice is really quite low."
The drugs used to prevent HIV in potentially exposed people are expensive,
and typically cause a host of side effects, including upset stomach, diarrhea,
headache and fatigue, Havens said.
"There's no reason to do all of that if you're not really at risk of
HIV," Havens said.
In the journal Pediatrics, Havens and his colleagues reviewed information
about the risks of getting HIV from different accidental exposures, such as
blood transfusions, unprotected sex and needle sharing.
Certain types of accidental exposures tend to occur more commonly in
children, such as when children prick themselves with a used needle, or when
infants become exposed to the breast milk of an HIV-positive woman.
Havens stressed that while the report cautions against automatic treatment
after every possible accidental exposure in children, doctors should not
hesitate to give medicine to children who they believe have a real risk of
getting HIV, such as children who have been sexually abused by an HIV-infected
person.
But in all cases, doctors should first determine the risk that each exposure
will lead to infection, and the chance that the person the child is exposed to
actually has HIV, Havens said.
Once those factors are taken into account, it becomes clear that most
accidental exposures in children are unlikely to cause HIV, he added.
"In many ways, this can help people be reassured that they don't need to
give postexposure prophylaxis for many of the most common community
exposures," Havens said.
SOURCE: Pediatrics 2003;111:1475-1489.
Monday June 2, 3:38 pm ET
GSK will award $500,000 in research grants for innovative HIV/AIDS drug
research in recognition of the need to produce new alternatives and hope in
the fight against the HIV/AIDS pandemic. The one-time research grants range from $25,000 to $150,000 and are
intended to further the development of inventive treatments for HIV/AIDS,
including therapies aimed at treating infection, prophylactic vaccines, or
microbicides designed to prevent transmission of the virus.
For detailed information about the GSK Drug Discovery and Development
Research Grant Program, as well as an application, please call 1-888-527-6935
or visit www.dddresearchgrant.com
.
Since the inception of the Drug Discovery and Development Research Grant
Program in 2001, GSK has honored nine researchers for their groundbreaking
work toward new pharmaceutical strategies to combat the HIV virus. Research
grant recipients will be announced in September 2003 at the Interscience
Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) in Chicago. The
grants will be paid Nov. 1, 2003.
GlaxoSmithKline is a pharmaceutical industry leader in HIV research and
therapies. The company is engaged in basic research programs designed to
investigate new targets to treat HIV. In addition to GlaxoSmithKline's Drug
Discovery and Development Research Grant Program, the company also provides
grants to community based organizations that provide services to those whose
lives are most affected by HIV.
SYDNEY (AFP) - Researchers began recruiting volunteers for the first human
trials of a new Australian-developed HIV vaccine.
The trial, on 24 volunteers, is being conducted by the Australian-Thai HIV
Vaccine Consortium and will take place at Sydney's St Vincent's Hospital. Researcher Stephen Kent said while laboratory tests had showed the DNA
vaccine could boost the number of immune cells that attack HIV, clinical trials
were needed to ensure it was safe for humans.
"This trial is a critical early step in developing an effective HIV
vaccine," he said. "We now need to establish these vaccines can
produce a strong effect on the immune system in human volunteers."
Principal investigator Tony Kelleher of the University of New South Wales
said it would be the first time the vaccine was given to humans.
"We will be able to undertake a range of sophisticated laboratory tests
to determine if the vaccines stimulate the human immune system to produce
anti-HIV responses," he said. "Their responses will help us in further
development of the vaccines."
The vaccine uses modified HIV DNA and a fowl pox virus. The theory is that
the modified DNA helps the body identify HIV components, then the fowl pox
forces the immune system to boost production of the number of cells capable of
killing the HIV virus.
Trial results are expected to be available by the end of the year.
Australian-Thai HIV Vacine Consortium includes four Australian universities,
the government science agency CSIRO, AIDS bodies and the Thai Red Cross Society.
Press Release
Source: GlaxoSmithKline
GlaxoSmithKline Drug Discovery and Development Research
Grant Program 2003
|
Wed Jun 4, 5:31 PM ET
|
By Keith Mulvihill
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - A 39-year-old
Harvard scientist previously diagnosed with AIDS has survived two years after a
heart transplant, according to a report released Wednesday, which suggests that
other HIV-infected patients may be possible candidates for heart transplant.
Because donor hearts are in such short supply, the medical community will
need to decide if HIV-infected patients -- once considered ineligible for
transplant due to a poor expected prognosis -- should routinely be put on
transplant waiting lists, according to the report in The New England Journal of
Medicine.
"This was a benchmark kind of study," said Dr. Gregory Curfman,
executive editor of the journal. Curfman said that publication of the report
should get the medical community thinking about the issue of organ
transplantation in HIV-infected individuals.
The new study, along with preliminary results from studies of liver and
kidney transplants, "provides hope" that some HIV-infected patients
can benefit from a transplant, according to an editorial by Drs. Michelle E.
Roland and Diane V. Havlir of the AIDS Division of the Positive Health Program
at the University of California, San Francisco.
The National Institutes of Health is currently conducting a study of 150
kidney transplants and 125 liver transplants in HIV-infected individuals, they
note.
"Originally that study was to include heart transplantations, but its
design was revised to focus on those organs for which there is greater
need," they write. "It is hoped that funds will become available to
add heart transplantation if the preliminary results are positive."
Many transplantation centers have been hesitant to allocate donor organs to
HIV-infected patients because it was believed that immune system-suppressing
drugs -- which must be taken by transplant patients for the rest of their lives
-- might further damage an HIV patient's already embattled immune system.
However research has begun to suggest that HIV infection does not necessarily
affect how well the patient responds to the new organ. Furthermore, therapies
that suppress the immune system do not appear to increase an HIV-infected
patient's susceptibility to infections.
To date, the bulk of organ transplants among HIV-infected individuals have
involved kidney and liver transplants.
Indeed, the study's lead author Dr. Leonard H. Calabrese of the Cleveland
Clinic Foundation in Ohio and colleagues note that the need for heart
transplantation among HIV-infected individuals is much lower than the need for
liver or kidney transplants. This is because there is a higher rate of other
illnesses such as hepatitis B or C and HIV-related kidney disease.
The 39-year-old transplant patient, Dr. Robert Zackin, a researcher at the
Harvard School of Public Health, was infected with HIV in 1986 and diagnosed
with an AIDS-defining infection in 1992. Zackin, who also happens to be a senior
author of the report, also developed Kaposi's sarcoma, a type of cancer often
found in AIDS patients. Zackin underwent a battery of treatments to fight
infections in addition to chemotherapy for the cancer. However, he later
developed heart failure, perhaps as a result of his anti-cancer treatment.
He underwent a heart transplant in February 2001. Now, more than two years
after the surgery, Zackin reportedly has experienced no new or reactivation of
opportunistic infections and anti-HIV therapy continues to keep levels of the
virus low. What's more, he continues to work full-time and exercise regularly,
the study indicates.
Still, Zackin's recovery has not been without complications, according to the
report. He underwent several episodes of organ rejection, including other
complications that now require that he receive blood transfusions every two or
three weeks.
Commenting on the unusual circumstances in having an author of a case study
also be the patient in a report, Curfman told Reuters Health that as far as he
could remember this was the first time that the journal experienced such a
situation.
"We felt that it was important that if (Dr. Zackin) was to be an author,
he needed to be identified (as the patient)," said Curfman.
Moreover, Curfman added that the editorial team felt strongly that the study
was important since few, if any, previous studies have documented an
HIV-infected person with advanced disease getting a heart transplant.
"Given the assumption that (Zackin) had a legitimate place on the
recipient list there is no reason to suggest that he is a less eligible
candidate based only on his HIV status," said Dr. Holly Taylor, of the
Berman Bioethics Institute at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland.
"All of the people on the list have a fatal illness given that they all
need a new heart," Taylor said in an interview. "The fact that (Zackin)
has HIV doesn't mean that he won't benefit any less." SOURCE: The New England Journal of Medicine 2003;348:12323-2328.
|
Thu Jun 5, 8:05 AM ET
|
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - People who are
addicted to cocaine who undergo drug counseling reduce their cocaine use and
significantly decrease their HIV risk, according to a new report.
"Drug abuse treatment can have important positive public health benefits
even if the outcomes are less than perfect," lead study author Dr. George
Woody told Reuters Health. "The 12-step oriented combination of group and
individual counseling worked the best, though all patients reduced their
risk."
Woody urged everyone to "support substance abuse treatment. It can do a
lot of good both in the short and long term."
In an article in the Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, Woody,
who is at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, and his colleagues
report on changes in HIV risk among 487 people undergoing treatment for cocaine
addiction.
Treatment was associated with an average reduction of cocaine use from 10
days per month to one day per month after six months, the authors report, with
participants who received both individual and group drug counseling faring best.
Treatment participation was also associated with significant reductions in
risky sex and the total risk of HIV infection, the report indicates.
Those who completed treatment showed a trend toward less sex risk and
significantly less total risk than did patients who dropped out before
completing their program, the researchers note.
HIV risk reduction corresponded to reductions in drug use and to improvements
in psychiatric symptoms, the results indicate. This improvement was similar
regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation or the presence of antisocial
personality disorder.
"The fact that all treatments consisted of no more than three weekly
outpatient sessions that included risk reduction counseling is worth
noting," the authors conclude, "because it suggests that reductions in
cocaine use and HIV risk can be achieved at a relatively low cost, at least for
a portion of the patients who seek treatment for cocaine dependence."
SOURCE: Journal of AIDS 2003;33:82-87.