News (Updated March 8,
2003)
[Home]
[Previous
news]
|
Tue Feb 25, 5:35 PM ET
|
By Stephanie Riesenman
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - While the United
Nations says China is "on the verge of a catastrophe" with regard to
HIV infection, 90% of health care workers know little about how the virus is
spread and are apprehensive about treating AIDS patients, a study of hospitals
in one mid-size city shows.
"There's still a lot of misunderstanding about how the virus can and
cannot be transmitted and a misunderstanding about hospital policies," said
Dr. Allen Anderson, assistant dean in the School of Public and Environmental
Affairs at Indiana University in Kokomo. "There needs to be a lot more
education at the grass roots level" for healthcare workers, he told Reuters
Health. Last year, Anderson and a group of Chinese researchers gave questionnaires to
149 healthcare workers from three different hospitals. The questions addressed
doctors' and nurses' understanding of HIV transmission, knowledge of their
hospital's HIV control policies and attitudes toward infected patients.
Almost 92% of those surveyed said they were concerned about contracting HIV
on the job.
Only 27% thought accidental needle sticks--which can spread HIV--were a
potential source for contracting the virus.
Although blood, semen and vaginal fluid were widely recognized by the
healthcare workers as potentially dangerous, 34% thought HIV could be passed
through saliva.
About 4% of workers believed they could contract the disease by breathing the
air in a patient's room.
Fourteen percent thought HIV could be transmitted through urine, and 9%
believed exposure to feces was risky. About 22% of respondents believed they
could pick up HIV from toilet seats.
A third of healthcare workers believed HIV could be transmitted through
mosquito bites.
Several workers had received some sort of HIV/AIDS instruction in the past,
but still held these misconceptions.
"Both their high degree of concern about contracting HIV and their low
level of understanding regarding how the virus is not transmitted may help
explain why a sizable proportion of participants had little desire to care for
HIV/AIDS patients," the researchers write.
The study is published in the February issue of Infection Control and
Hospital Epidemiology.
In some of China's more modern cities, like Beijing, Anderson says the
knowledge about HIV is probably much better. But in the rural areas, where most
people with HIV live, the understanding is much lower.
The most recent number of documented HIV cases in China is 40,560, according
to Anderson, who noted that this number is probably far too low.
"They have not been able to do really broad testing outside of high risk
populations like prostitutes and drug users, so they're estimating at least one
million actual infections in the country," said Anderson.
Unless more healthcare workers are willing to treat HIV patients and
effective prevention and control policies are put in place, some experts believe
the number of HIV-infected Chinese will grow to 10 million by 2010.
Anderson is one of several researchers working to address the problem of
ignorance among Chinese healthcare workers. He and his colleagues will test a
training module this summer that incorporates a hands-on approach to educating
Chinese hospital staff about how HIV is spread and how to care for HIV-infected
patients properly.
"Culturally, there is still more apprehension in talking about sexually
related matters and talking about AIDS," said Anderson. "A lot of
stigma is carried by individuals who have HIV in China. I think that barrier has
to be overcome in the educational process."
SOURCE: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2003;24:128-131.
![]() |
| Dr. Donald Francis, president of VaxGen Inc., talks to National Public Radio via phone in downtown San Francisco on Monday, Feb. 24, 2003. The failure of VaxGen Inc.'s closely watched AIDS vaccine experiment underscored just how far scientists are from bringing the disease under control. The announcement sent the developer's stock price sharply down.(AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez) |
By PAUL ELIAS, AP Biotechnology Writer
SAN FRANCISCO - An experimental AIDS vaccine
being developed by VaxGen Inc. does not appear to protect most people from the
disease, but does show promise in protecting blacks and Asians, the company
said.
The overall expected rate of infection was not reduced in the high-risk
people who volunteered to take the vaccine, VaxGen said late Sunday. However, the expected infection rate for the 314 black volunteers who
received the vaccine was reduced by 78 percent — a finding the researchers
said was unexpected. The rate was reduced by 67 percent for all nonwhite
volunteers other than Hispanics.
"This is the first time we have specific numbers to suggest that a
vaccine has prevented HIV infection in humans," VaxGen vice president
Phillip Berman said in a prepared statement Sunday night. "We're not sure
yet why certain groups have a better immune response."
The Brisbane, California-based company said it planned to continue developing
the vaccine and will examine more closely why it worked better in blacks and
Asians than it did in whites and Hispanics.
The experiment, which initially involved 5,400 people at high-risk for the
disease, had been criticized by some activists who say it could encourage risky
behavior. Even if the vaccine proved effective on some level, there might be no
way to tell if it has worked on a particular individual.
But VaxGen has won widespread praise from doctors and the FDA for its
handling of an ethically difficult test. The company counseled patients in the
experiments to practice safe sex because the vaccine may not work and because
one-third of the volunteers received the placebo.
The publicly traded company's stock has risen and fallen dramatically during
the last year as rumors of the experiment's results swirled. It sold for as low
as $4.81 a share and as high as $23.25. It closed at $13.02 in trading on the
Nasdaq Stock Market Friday.
Experts believe a vaccine is the only way to stop the worldwide AIDS
epidemic, which has already killed 20 million people and infected 40 million
more.
Merck & Co. is developing a different type of vaccine that has showed
promise in early human testing, but researchers caution they are still years
away from proving whether it works.
By DEBORAH KONG, AP Minority Issues Writer
SAN FRANCISCO - Researchers trying to learn more
about why an AIDS vaccine appeared to work well in a small number of black
volunteers may have trouble finding people for further studies, advocates and
educators warn.
Suspicion of medical research runs deep among many blacks, they say, and the
reason can be summarized in one word: Tuskegee. In the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, conducted by the federal government between
1932 and 1972, researchers withheld medical treatment from poor, black men in
Macon County, Alabama, for experimental purposes. The men were not told they had
syphilis, and weren't treated for the disease even after penicillin became
available. By the time the study was exposed, 128 men had died of syphilis or
related complications.
More than 30 years later, the damage done by that study still lingers, black
activists say — even hindering efforts to halt the AIDS epidemic.
"Many African-Americans are suspicious of the health care system and
suspicious of doctors and scientists because there's a legacy of
mistreatment," said Phill Wilson, executive director of the Los
Angeles-based Black AIDS Institute.
"Even though people may or may not know the specifics of the Tuskegee
trials, they know that there are health disparities and that blacks often get
inferior treatment based on race."
J. Lawrence Miller, executive director of the Black Educational AIDS Project
in Baltimore calls it the "Tuskegee mentality."
"That distrust has become cultural," Miller said. "How do you
fight culture? You can't, except for education."
Blacks have been hit harder by AIDS than any other racial or ethnic group in
America. They represented about half of new HIV cases reported in the United
States in 2001 — the largest of any group, according to the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
"Given the disproportionate impact that the AIDS epidemic has on black
people, we stand to gain the most by the development of an effective HIV/AIDS
vaccine," Wilson said. "We need to do a better job of recruiting black
volunteers for these clinical trials."
Blacks made up just 6 percent of the 5,009 volunteers who participated in
VaxGen Inc.'s AIDS vaccine experiment.
The experiment showed that there were 78 percent fewer infections among black
volunteers who took the vaccine than in those who received a placebo.
In whole numbers, that meant four of the 203 blacks who received the vaccine
became infected while nine of the 111 who received the placebo were infected.
The company said those results were statistically significant and showed that
the vaccine has value. But some observers warned that the sample size was too
small.
There were similar results among the small number of Asians involved in the
study.
VaxGen spokesman Jim Key said it was difficult for the company to recruit
minority participants.
"There was still considerable skepticism among people of color regarding
medical research and specifically regarding HIV vaccine research. There are so
many myths and fears and conspiracy theories regarding HIV," Key said.
"My hope is that this will be a catalyst."
Steve Wakefield, of the HIV Vaccine Trials Network, worries that if too few
blacks participate in research, scientists won't have enough information to help
people, both here and in Africa.
Wakefield, the network's associate director for community relations, said he
is always asked about Tuskegee when he makes presentations to minority groups in
this country.
In Africa, "the one question I get asked from country to country is 'How
many black Americans have already taken this product or been in research with
this?'" said Wakefield, who is black.
By Ben Hirschler, European Pharmaceuticals Correspondent
LONDON (Reuters) - Switzerland's Roche Holding AG on Monday priced its new
HIV drug Fuzeon at a record-breaking 18,980 euros ($20,570) a year, fueling
controversy about the cost of AIDS treatments.
Fuzeon, also known as T-20, is the first in a new class of drugs known as
fusion inhibitors designed for people resistant to other AIDS medicines. Unlike
existing drugs that work inside the cell, it blocks HIV from entering healthy
human immune cells.
Roche said the high cost -- more than any other AIDS drug on the market --
reflected the complexity of manufacturing the product, involving more than 100
production steps.
"This drug is 10 times more complex to manufacture than the next most
complex class of drug in the HIV arena, which is the protease inhibitors,"
David Reddy, head of Roche's HIV business, told Reuters in a telephone
interview.
He said Fuzeon had cost 840 million Swiss francs to develop, excluding
marketing expenses. More than half of that was accounted for by clinical trials,
and the lion's share of the rest reflected investment in specialist
manufacturing facilities. Pure research costs were only around one percent.
Reddy declined to comment on the profit margin that Roche would enjoy on
sales of Fuzeon, which it believes could eventually have peak annual sales of up
to one billion francs ($740 million).
PRODUCTION DIFFICULTIES
A twice-daily injection that is given in combination with existing drugs,
Fuzeon is expected to win marketing approval from regulators in both Europe and
the United States next month.
In the meantime, however, Roche is launching a pre-license special-access
program under which the drug will be available in certain European Union
countries.
Reddy said it was not yet clear which countries would participate in the
scheme or how many patients would be involved. Reddy said he did not envisage Fuzeon ever being suitable for use in Africa
-- the epicenter of the global AIDS pandemic -- given the drug's very high cost
of production. Global pharmaceutical companies, including Roche, have bowed to pressure from
humanitarian groups in recent years to slash the cost of life-saving AIDS drugs
in Africa and other poor countries. But Reddy said Fuzeon was in a different
category.
"Even if we were to price this drug at cost, it is not going to be the
type of drug that is suitable for the developing world," he said.
"We've thought long and hard about the price of this and we're coming
through with something that we really believe is fair, based upon what we've had
to invest and the risks that we've taken."
Including those already involved in clinical trials and an early free-access
program, some 3,500 people worldwide are likely to be on the drug by the end of
March.
The total should rise to 12,000-15,000 by the end of 2003 -- a lot fewer than
initially hoped, reflecting production difficulties at the main manufacturing
facility in Boulder, Colorado, where initial yields were lower and cycle times
longer than expected.
With analysts estimating that as many as 50,000 patients in North America and
Europe are resistant to other AIDS therapies and ready for Fuzeon, demand is
expected to outstrip supply for the foreseeable future. By the end of 2004,
Roche and its partner Trimeris Inc. of the U.S. expect to be able to supply the
drug to a maximum of 32,000 people, rising to 39,000 by the end of 2005.
($1=.9228 Euro)
Friday March 7, 10:46 pm ET
"While Judge Hatter granted the motion to dismiss, we will appeal his
decision. With 8,500 people dying of AIDS every day, we can not allow GSK's
inflated price for AZT and other HIV medications to stand unchallenged since
GSK has no legitimate claim to the underlying patents."
"In the court of public opinion, GSK has already lost," said
Weinstein. "The whole world is clamoring for affordable treatment for
people dying of AIDS, and GSK is standing in the way. We will continue to
pursue outstanding cases against GSK in South Africa and in California, as
well as shareholder actions," said Weinstein.
AIDS Healthcare Foundation is the US' largest AIDS organization. AHF serves
thousands of patients in California, New York and Florida regardless of their
insurance status or ability to pay. In addition, AHF currently operates two
free AIDS treatment clinics in Africa: the Ithembalabantu (Zulu for
"people's hope") Clinic in KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa &
the Uganda Cares Healthcare Center in Masaka, Uganda. www.aidshealth.org .
AZT
Patent Case Dismissed
Source: AIDS Healthcare Foundation